Practicing Democracy: Popular Politics in the United States from the Constitution to the Civil War

Marc Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Review Quotes: With this outstanding collection of essays, we can no longer afford to speak of the 'rise' of Jacksonian democracy. "Practicing Democracy" makes clear that American politics before the Civil War was more like an experimental and highly improvised symphony, because the American people, playing their parts both within and outside the major political parties, often discovered in themselves the means to rewrite the score.--Mark Hubbard, Eastern Illinois University, author of "Illinois's War: The Civil War in Documents"Review Quotes: "Practicing Democracy" breaks new ground in the analysis of early republican and antebellum political history and political culture. Building on previous 'new' political histories, it critiques and transcends them.--Ron Formisano, Professor of History Emeritus, University of Kentucky, author of "Plutocracy in America: How Inequality Destroys the Middle Class and Exploits the Poor"Biographical Note: Daniel Peart, Lecturer in American History at Queen Mary University of London, is author of "Era of Experimentation: American Political Practices in the Early Republic" (Virginia). Adam I. P. Smith, Senior Lecturer at University College London, is author of "The American Civil War."Description for Sales People: Countering the familiar narrative of a party-driven, Jacksonian democratic awakening, the contributors to this volume challenge the correlation of party with democratic participation and emphasize the proliferation of competing public voices in the buildup to the Civil War. Publisher Marketing: In "Practicing Democracy, " eleven historians challenge conventional narratives of democratization in the early United States, offering new perspectives on the period between the ratification of the Constitution and the outbreak of the Civil War. The essays in this collection address critical themes such as the origins, evolution, and disintegration of party competition, the relationship between political parties and popular participation, and the place that parties occupied within the wider world of United States politics. In recent years, historians of the early republic have demolished old assumptions about low rates of political participation and shallow popular partisanship in the age of Jefferson--raising the question of how, if at all, Jacksonian politics departed from earlier norms. This book reaffirms the significance of a transition in political practices during the 1820s and 1830s but casts the transformation in a new light. Whereas the traditional narrative is one of a party-driven democratic awakening, the contributors to this volume challenge the correlation of party with democracy. They both critique constricting definitions of legitimate democratic practices in the decades following the ratification of the Constitution and emphasize the proliferation of competing public voices in the buildup to the Civil War. Taken together, these essays offer a new way of thinking about American politics across the traditional dividing line of 1828 and suggest a novel approach to the long-standing question of what it meant to be part of "We the People." Contributors: Tyler Anbinder, George Washington University - Douglas Bradburn, Fred W. Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington at Mount Vernon - John L. Brooke, The Ohio State University - Andrew Heath, University of Sheffield - Reeve Huston, Duke University - Johann N. Neem, Western Washington University - Kenneth Owen, University of Illinois, Springfield - Graham A. Peck, Saint Xavier University - Andrew W. Robertson, Graduate Center of the City University of New York and Lehman College, CUNY

Contributor Bio:  Smith, Adam I P Adam I. P. Smith is a Lecturer in American History at University College London.